Labeling Audit: Compliance of Regulatory Mentions

Claim “Dietary Supplement” → ❌ NON-COMPLIANT

Why?

Under Regulation (EC) No 767/2009, the category “dietary supplement” is not recognized in animal nutrition.

Solution : 

This term refers to a compound feed with a high content of certain substances, but which does not, on its own, provide the animal’s complete daily ration.

Claim “Senior Dog” → ✅ COMPLIANT

Why?

• The target species must be clearly indicated on the label.

• Clarifications on the target population, such as “SENIOR,” are permitted if justified by the specific formulation of the product.

Claim “For Osteoarthritis” → ❌ NON-COMPLIANT

Why?

Any claim referencing a disease is prohibited.

Such mentions could lead to the product being reclassified as a medicinal product by presentation, which is subject to much stricter regulations.

Solution : 

A complementary feed is not intended to treat or relieve a disease. Therefore, the claim should be reformulated to highlight nutritional and functional benefits without referring to a pathology.

Conclusion

Verify the labeling to avoid non-compliance or reclassification as a medicinal product by presentation.

🚨 Incorrect labeling can result in sanctions and market withdrawal.

• Use appropriate regulatory terminology (e.g., “complementary feed” instead of “dietary supplement”).

• Avoid references to diseases to prevent reclassification as a medicinal product.

• Ensure the presence of all mandatory labeling mentions.

A labeling audit helps prevent errors and ensures compliance before market placement.